↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced care by generalists for functional somatic symptoms and disorders in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhanced care by generalists for functional somatic symptoms and disorders in primary care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008142.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne Rosendal, Annette H Blankenstein, Richard Morriss, Per Fink, Michael Sharpe, Christopher Burton

Abstract

Patients with medically unexplained or functional somatic symptoms are common in primary care. Previous reviews have reported benefit from specialised interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy and consultation letters, but there is a need for treatment models which can be applied within the primary care setting. Primary care studies of enhanced care, which includes techniques of reattribution or cognitive behavioural therapy, or both, have shown changes in healthcare professionals' attitudes and behaviour. However, studies of patient outcome have shown variable results and the value of enhanced care on patient outcome remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 192 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 36%
Psychology 43 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 29 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,256,523
of 13,217,902 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,007
of 10,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,664
of 181,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,217,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.