↓ Skip to main content

Atypical antipsychotics for psychosis in adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atypical antipsychotics for psychosis in adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009582.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajit Kumar, Soumitra S Datta, Stephen D Wright, Vivek A Furtado, Paul S Russell

Abstract

Schizophrenia often presents in adolescence, but current treatment guidelines are based largely on studies of adults with psychosis. Over the past decade, the number of studies on treatment of adolescent-onset psychosis has increased. The current systematic review collates and critiques evidence obtained on the use of various atypical antipsychotic medications for adolescents with psychosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 22%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Other 14 7%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 33%
Psychology 33 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 42 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,042,083
of 14,322,164 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,068
of 10,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,272
of 184,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.