↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a smartphone-based EEG among people with epilepsy: A prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of a smartphone-based EEG among people with epilepsy: A prospective study
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep45567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica D. McKenzie, Andrew S. P. Lim, Edward C. W. Leung, Andrew J. Cole, Alice D. Lam, Ani Eloyan, Damber K. Nirola, Lhab Tshering, Ronald Thibert, Rodrigo Zepeda Garcia, Esther Bui, Sonam Deki, Liesly Lee, Sarah J. Clark, Joseph M. Cohen, Jo Mantia, Kate T. Brizzi, Tali R. Sorets, Sarah Wahlster, Mia Borzello, Arkadiusz Stopczynski, Sydney S. Cash, Farrah J. Mateen

Abstract

Our objective was to assess the ability of a smartphone-based electroencephalography (EEG) application, the Smartphone Brain Scanner-2 (SBS2), to detect epileptiform abnormalities compared to standard clinical EEG. The SBS2 system consists of an Android tablet wirelessly connected to a 14-electrode EasyCap headset (cost ~ 300 USD). SBS2 and standard EEG were performed in people with suspected epilepsy in Bhutan (2014-2015), and recordings were interpreted by neurologists. Among 205 participants (54% female, median age 24 years), epileptiform discharges were detected on 14% of SBS2 and 25% of standard EEGs. The SBS2 had 39.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI) 25.8%, 53.9%) and 94.8% specificity (95% CI 90.0%, 97.7%) for epileptiform discharges with positive and negative predictive values of 0.71 (95% CI 0.51, 0.87) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76, 0.89) respectively. 31% of focal and 82% of generalized abnormalities were identified on SBS2 recordings. Cohen's kappa (κ) for the SBS2 EEG and standard EEG for the epileptiform versus non-epileptiform outcome was κ = 0.40 (95% CI 0.25, 0.55). No safety or tolerability concerns were reported. Despite limitations in sensitivity, the SBS2 may become a viable supportive test for the capture of epileptiform abnormalities, and extend EEG access to new, especially resource-limited, populations at a reduced cost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Engineering 12 10%
Psychology 11 9%
Computer Science 9 7%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,735,765
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#16,130
of 136,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,258
of 314,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#583
of 4,335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.