You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fathers’ Perceptions of Change Following Parenting Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial of Triple P for Parents of Children With Asthma or Eczema1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alina Morawska, Amy E. Mitchell, Scott Burgess, Jennifer Fraser |
| Abstract |
To test whether families' participation in an evidence-based parenting program can improve health-related outcomes reported by fathers of 2- to 10-year-old children with asthma and/or eczema. A 2 (Triple P-Positive Parenting Program vs. care as usual) by 3 (baseline, postintervention, 6-month follow-up) design was used, with random group assignment. Of 107 families, 51.4% ( N = 55) had a father participate alongside the child's mother, who was the primary intervention target. Fathers completed questionnaires assessing illness-related child behavior problems; self-efficacy with illness management and illness-related child behavior problems; and health-related quality of life. Secondary intent-to-treat analyses indicated improved child behavior and self-efficacy for managing eczema, but not asthma. Health-related quality of life improved for children, but not parents/families. There were no other significant intervention effects. Intervention outcomes were positive for eczema but not asthma, and did not depend on the extent of father participation in the intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 24% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,210,508
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Psychology
#366
of 1,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,636
of 310,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Psychology
#27
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.