↓ Skip to main content

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008704.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivien Hunot, Theresa HM Moore, Deborah M Caldwell, Toshi A Furukawa, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Mina Honyashiki, Peiyao Chen, Glyn Lewis, Rachel Churchill

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represents a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as a treatment for depression compared with other psychological therapies remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 329 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 20%
Researcher 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 10%
Other 96 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 158 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 20%
Unspecified 39 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Other 29 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#199,004
of 13,617,017 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#467
of 10,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,964
of 182,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.