↓ Skip to main content

Regarding Twitter as a Potential Data Source for Cardiovascular Disease Research—Reply

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Cardiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Regarding Twitter as a Potential Data Source for Cardiovascular Disease Research—Reply
Published in
JAMA Cardiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Sinnenberg, David A. Asch, Raina M. Merchant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,869,819
of 11,531,674 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Cardiology
#738
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,688
of 265,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Cardiology
#101
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,531,674 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.