↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative real-time PCR detection of Zika virus and evaluation with field-caught Mosquitoes

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
673 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative real-time PCR detection of Zika virus and evaluation with field-caught Mosquitoes
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-10-311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oumar Faye, Ousmane Faye, Diawo Diallo, Mawlouth Diallo, Manfred Weidmann, Amadou Alpha Sall

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV), a mosquito borne flavivirus is a pathogen affecting humans in Asia and Africa. ZIKV infection diagnosis relies on serology-which is challenging due to cross-reactions with other flaviviruses and/or absence or low titer of IgM and IgG antibodies at early phase of infection- virus isolation, which is labor intensive, time consuming and requires appropriate containment. Therefore, real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) is an appealing option as a rapid, sensitive and specific method for detection of ZIKV in the early stage of infection. So far, only one rRT-PCR assay has been described in the context of the outbreak in Micronesia in 2007. In this study, we described a one step rRT-PCR for ZIKV which can detect a wider genetic diversity of ZIKV isolates from Asia and Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 673 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 1%
United States 9 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 640 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 132 20%
Researcher 125 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 13%
Student > Bachelor 81 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 134 20%
Unknown 78 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 120 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 98 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 54 8%
Engineering 14 2%
Other 102 15%
Unknown 108 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,214,428
of 24,942,536 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#90
of 3,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,096
of 218,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#5
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,942,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.