You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genetic heterogeneity and mutational burden of engineered melanomas in zebrafish models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Yen, Richard M White, David C Wedge, Peter Van Loo, Jeroen de Ridder, Amy Capper, Jennifer Richardson, David Jones, Keiran Raine, Ian R Watson, Chang-Jiun Wu, Jiqiu Cheng, Iñigo Martincorena, Serena Nik-Zainal, Laura Mudie, Yves Moreau, John Marshall, Manasa Ramakrishna, Patrick Tarpey, Adam Shlien, Ian Whitmore, Steve Gamble, Calli Latimer, Erin Langdon, Charles Kaufman, Mike Dovey, Alison Taylor, Andy Menzies, Stuart McLaren, Sarah O’Meara, Adam Butler, Jon Teague, James Lister, Lynda Chin, Peter Campbell, David J Adams, Leonard I Zon, E Elizabeth Patton, Derek L Stemple, P Andy Futreal |
| Abstract |
Melanoma is the most deadly form of skin cancer. Expression of oncogenic BRAF or NRAS, which are frequently mutated in human melanomas, promote the formation of nevi but are not sufficient for tumorigenesis. Even with germline mutated p53, these engineered melanomas present with variable onset and pathology, implicating additional somatic mutations in a multi-hit tumorigenic process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,227,130
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,857
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,512
of 320,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#64
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.