↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture for dysphagia in acute stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture for dysphagia in acute stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006076.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Xie, Liping Wang, Jinghua He, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Dysphagia after acute stroke is associated with poor prognosis, particularly if prolonged. Acupuncture has been widely used for this complication in China. However, its therapeutic effect is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 127 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 10 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 25 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,041,139
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,994
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,011,844
of 11,983,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,905
of 8,672 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,983,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,672 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.