↓ Skip to main content

Homoeopathy for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
145 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homoeopathy for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline A Smith

Abstract

This is one of series of reviews of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology. Homoeopathy involves the use, in dilution, of substances which cause symptoms in their undiluted form. A type of herb, 'caulophyllum' is one type of homoeopathic therapy that has been used to induce labour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 9 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#96,392
of 13,935,576 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#200
of 10,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,881
of 13,214,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#192
of 9,752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,935,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,214,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.