↓ Skip to main content

Inland waters and their role in the carbon cycle of Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inland waters and their role in the carbon cycle of Alaska
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/eap.1552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah M. Stackpoole, David E. Butman, David W. Clow, Kristine L. Verdin, Benjamin V. Gaglioti, Hélène Genet, Robert G. Striegl

Abstract

The magnitude of Alaska (AK) inland waters carbon (C) fluxes is likely to change in the future due to amplified climate warming impacts on the hydrology and biogeochemical processes in high latitude regions. Although current estimates of major aquatic C fluxes represent an essential baseline against which future change can be compared, a comprehensive assessment for AK has not yet been completed. To address this gap, we combined available datasets and applied consistent methodologies to estimate river lateral C export to the coast, river and lake carbon dioxide (CO2 ) and methane (CH4 ) emissions, and C burial in lakes for the six major hydrologic regions in the state. Estimated total aquatic C flux for AK was 41 Tg C yr(-1) . Major components of this total flux, in Tg C yr(-1) , were 18 for river lateral export, 17 for river CO2 emissions, and 8 for lake CO2 emissions. Lake C burial offset these fluxes by 2 Tg C yr(-1) . River and lake CH4 emissions were 0.03 and 0.10 Tg C yr(-1) , respectively. The Southeast and South - Central regions had the highest temperature, precipitation, terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP), and C yields (fluxes normalized to land area) were 77 and 42 g C m(-2) yr(-1) , respectively. Lake CO2 emissions represented over half of the total aquatic flux from the Southwest (37 g C m(-2) yr(-1) ). The North Slope, Northwest, and Yukon regions had lesser yields (11, 15, and 17 g C m(2) yr(-1) ), but these estimates may be the most vulnerable to future climate change, because of the heightened sensitivity of arctic and boreal ecosystems to intensified warming. Total aquatic C yield for AK was 27 g C m(-2) yr(-1) , which represented 16% of the estimated terrestrial NPP. Freshwater ecosystems represent a significant conduit for C loss, and a more comprehensive view of land-water-atmosphere interactions is necessary to predict future climate change impacts on the Alaskan ecosystem C balance. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Master 10 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#741,950
of 14,145,010 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#205
of 2,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,631
of 264,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,145,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.