↓ Skip to main content

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008705.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Churchill, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Kiyomi Shinohara, Hissei Imai, Glyn Lewis, Vivien Hunot

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represent a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as treatment for acute depression remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 420 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 17%
Researcher 67 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 11%
Other 80 19%
Unknown 57 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 154 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 101 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 8%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 79 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,111,680
of 17,156,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,837
of 11,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,506
of 193,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,156,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.