↓ Skip to main content

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008705.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Churchill, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Kiyomi Shinohara, Hissei Imai, Glyn Lewis, Vivien Hunot

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represent a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as treatment for acute depression remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 266 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 11%
Other 73 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 26%
Unspecified 30 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Other 23 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,732,153
of 12,886,920 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,345
of 10,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,451
of 179,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,886,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.