↓ Skip to main content

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008705.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Churchill, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Kiyomi Shinohara, Hissei Imai, Glyn Lewis, Vivien Hunot

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represent a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as treatment for acute depression remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 385 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 17%
Researcher 60 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 11%
Other 77 19%
Unknown 47 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 142 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 95 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 69 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,840,627
of 15,727,088 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,491
of 11,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,041
of 188,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,727,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.