↓ Skip to main content

Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008696.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiyomi Shinohara, Mina Honyashiki, Hissei Imai, Vivien Hunot, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Rachel Churchill

Abstract

Behavioural therapies represent one of several categories of psychological therapies that are currently used in the treatment of depression. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of behavioural therapies for depression compared with other psychological therapies remain unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 471 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 63 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 8%
Other 80 17%
Unknown 115 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 137 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 105 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 7%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Neuroscience 10 2%
Other 39 8%
Unknown 133 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,454,366
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,131
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,118
of 224,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.