You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structuring supplemental materials in support of reproducibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1205-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dov Greenbaum, Joel Rozowsky, Victoria Stodden, Mark Gerstein |
| Abstract |
Supplements are increasingly important to the scientific record, particularly in genomics. However, they are often underutilized. Optimally, supplements should make results findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (i.e., "FAIR"). Moreover, properly off-loading to them the data and detail in a paper could make the main text more readable. We propose a hierarchical organization for supplements, with some parts paralleling and "shadowing" the main text and other elements branching off from it, and we suggest a specific formatting to make this structure explicit. Furthermore, sections of the supplement could be presented in multiple scientific "dialects", including machine-readable and lay-friendly formats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 15% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 48% |
| Scientists | 25 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#959,395
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#680
of 4,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,571
of 324,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#19
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.