| Title |
An estimation of the number of cells in the human body
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Human Biology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3109/03014460.2013.807878 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Bianconi, Allison Piovesan, Federica Facchin, Alina Beraudi, Raffaella Casadei, Flavia Frabetti, Lorenza Vitale, Maria Chiara Pelleri, Simone Tassani, Francesco Piva, Soledad Perez-Amodio, Pierluigi Strippoli, Silvia Canaider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,938 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 604 | 31% |
| United States | 24 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | <1% |
| China | 8 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 7 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | <1% |
| Sweden | 6 | <1% |
| Austria | 6 | <1% |
| Turkey | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 67 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1187 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1865 | 96% |
| Scientists | 60 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,838 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1786 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 357 | 19% |
| Researcher | 258 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 253 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 243 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 84 | 5% |
| Other | 269 | 15% |
| Unknown | 374 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 378 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 373 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 172 | 9% |
| Engineering | 111 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 49 | 3% |
| Other | 330 | 18% |
| Unknown | 425 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1350. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#9,676
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Human Biology
#1
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28
of 207,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Human Biology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.