You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interpreter-mediated diabetes consultations: a qualitative analysis of physician communication practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Hudelson, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Noelle Junod Perron, Alexander Bischoff |
| Abstract |
Patient-provider communication, in particular physicians' ability to listen to their patients, and support them in making difficult lifestyle changes, is an essential component of effective diabetes care. Clinical communication around diabetes can be especially challenging when language barriers are present, and may contribute to poor diabetes management and outcomes. Clinicians need to be aware of and address potential communication difficulties associated with interpreter-mediated consultations. The purpose of our study was to explore how physicians communicate in interpreter-mediated consultations with diabetic patients, and how their communication behaviors may impact diabetes communication and care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,330
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,334
of 224,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.