↓ Skip to main content

Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization

Overview of attention for article published in Perioperative Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization
Published in
Perioperative Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2047-0525-2-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christos Chamos, Liana Vele, Mark Hamilton, Maurizio Cecconi

Abstract

The monitoring of the cardiac output (CO) and other hemodynamic parameters, traditionally performed with the thermodilution method via a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), is now increasingly done with the aid of less invasive and much easier to use devices. When used within the context of a hemodynamic optimization protocol, they can positively influence the outcome in both surgical and non-surgical patient populations. While these monitoring tools have simplified the hemodynamic calculations, they are subject to limitations and can lead to erroneous results if not used properly. In this article we will review the commercially available minimally invasive CO monitoring devices, explore their technical characteristics and describe the limitations that should be taken into consideration when clinical decisions are made.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 16 18%
Other 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 64%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,483,718
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Perioperative Medicine
#85
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,757
of 203,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perioperative Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.