↓ Skip to main content

Male circumcision for prevention of homosexual acquisition of HIV in men

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Male circumcision for prevention of homosexual acquisition of HIV in men
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007496.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiysonge CS, Kongnyuy EJ, Shey M, Muula AS, Navti OB, Akl EA, Lo YR, Wiysonge, Charles Shey, Kongnyuy, Eugene J, Shey, Muki, Muula, Adamson S, Navti, Osric B, Akl, Elie A, Lo, Ying-Ru, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Eugene J Kongnyuy, Muki Shey, Adamson S Muula, Osric B Navti, Elie A Akl, Ying-Ru Lo

Abstract

Previous systematic reviews found inconsistent effects of male circumcision on HIV acquisition in men who have sex with men (MSM). However, a number of new studies have become available in the three years since the last systematic review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
South Africa 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 78 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 27%
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 5 5%
Other 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 61%
Social Sciences 15 16%
Unspecified 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,764,831
of 11,682,907 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,526
of 9,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,673,252
of 11,029,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,510
of 9,099 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,682,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,029,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,099 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.