↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing the catalytic activity of hydronium ions through constrained environments

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing the catalytic activity of hydronium ions through constrained environments
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms14113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanshuai Liu, Aleksei Vjunov, Hui Shi, Sebastian Eckstein, Donald M. Camaioni, Donghai Mei, Eszter Baráth, Johannes A. Lercher

Abstract

The dehydration of alcohols is involved in many organic conversions but has to overcome high free-energy barriers in water. Here we demonstrate that hydronium ions confined in the nanopores of zeolite HBEA catalyse aqueous phase dehydration of cyclohexanol at a rate significantly higher than hydronium ions in water. This rate enhancement is not related to a shift in mechanism; for both cases, the dehydration of cyclohexanol occurs via an E1 mechanism with the cleavage of Cβ-H bond being rate determining. The higher activity of hydronium ions in zeolites is caused by the enhanced association between the hydronium ion and the alcohol, as well as a higher intrinsic rate constant in the constrained environments compared with water. The higher rate constant is caused by a greater entropy of activation rather than a lower enthalpy of activation. These insights should allow us to understand and predict similar processes in confined spaces.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 33%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 29%
Chemical Engineering 22 24%
Engineering 7 8%
Materials Science 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#398,515
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,835
of 47,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,508
of 310,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#199
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.