↓ Skip to main content

Local and cross‐seasonal associations of climate and land use with abundance of monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local and cross‐seasonal associations of climate and land use with abundance of monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus
Published in
Ecography, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/ecog.02719
Authors

Sarah P. Saunders, Leslie Ries, Karen S. Oberhauser, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Elise F. Zipkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 39%
Environmental Science 26 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#523,484
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#85
of 2,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,958
of 316,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.