You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The efficacy of long-lasting nets with declining physical integrity may be compromised in areas with high levels of pyrethroid resistance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-368 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric O Ochomo, Nabie M Bayoh, Edward D Walker, Bernard O Abongo, Maurice O Ombok, Collins Ouma, Andrew K Githeko, John Vulule, Guiyun Yan, John E Gimnig |
Abstract |
Long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito nets (LLINs) are a primary malaria prevention strategy in sub-Saharan Africa. However, emergence of insecticide resistance threatens the effectiveness of LLINs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 171 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
Researcher | 29 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 19% |
Unknown | 30 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 19% |
Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,263,583
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,766
of 5,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,728
of 211,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#26
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.