↓ Skip to main content

Reducing the stigma of mental illness in undergraduate medical education: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing the stigma of mental illness in undergraduate medical education: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andriyka Papish, Aliya Kassam, Geeta Modgill, Gina Vaz, Lauren Zanussi, Scott Patten

Abstract

The stigma of mental illness among medical students is a prevalent concern that has far reaching negative consequences. Attempts to combat this stigma through educational initiatives have had mixed results. This study examined the impact of a one-time contact-based educational intervention on the stigma of mental illness among medical students and compared this with a multimodal undergraduate psychiatry course at the University of Calgary, Canada that integrates contact-based educational strategies. Attitudes towards mental illness were compared with those towards type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 311 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 18%
Student > Master 39 12%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 79 25%
Unknown 65 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 29%
Psychology 55 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 13%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 80 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,231,443
of 25,238,182 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#319
of 3,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,041
of 219,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,238,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.