↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

"It's hard to tell": The challenges of scoring patients on standardised outcome measures by multidisciplinary teams: a case study of neurorehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
"It's hard to tell": The challenges of scoring patients on standardised outcome measures by multidisciplinary teams: a case study of neurorehabilitation
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-217
Pubmed ID
18945357
Authors

J Greenhalgh, AF Long, R Flynn, S Tyson

Abstract

Interest is increasing in the application of standardised outcome measures in clinical practice. Measures designed for use in research may not be sufficiently precise to be used in monitoring individual patients. However, little is known about how clinicians and in particular, multidisciplinary teams, score patients using these measures. This paper explores the challenges faced by multidisciplinary teams in allocating scores on standardised outcome measures in clinical practice.

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Psychology 8 11%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,190,638
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,548
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,522
of 91,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.