You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary supplements for preventing postnatal depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009104.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brendan J Miller, Linda Murray, Michael M Beckmann, Terrence Kent, Bonnie Macfarlane |
| Abstract |
Postnatal depression is a medical condition that affects many women and the development of their infants. There is a lack of evidence for treatment and prevention strategies that are safe for mothers and infants. Certain dietary deficiencies in a pregnant or postnatal woman's diet may cause postnatal depression. By correcting these deficiencies postnatal depression could be prevented in some women. Specific examples of dietary supplements aimed at preventing postnatal depression include: omega-3 fatty acids, iron, folate, s-adenosyl-L-methionine, cobalamin, pyridoxine, riboflavin, vitamin D and calcium. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 658 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 648 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 119 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 12% |
| Researcher | 70 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 45 | 7% |
| Other | 115 | 17% |
| Unknown | 163 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 203 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 13% |
| Psychology | 82 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 61 | 9% |
| Unknown | 182 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,256,433
of 24,257,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,781
of 12,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,856
of 217,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,257,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.