↓ Skip to main content

Dietary supplements for preventing postnatal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary supplements for preventing postnatal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009104.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendan J Miller, Linda Murray, Michael M Beckmann, Terrence Kent, Bonnie Macfarlane

Abstract

Postnatal depression is a medical condition that affects many women and the development of their infants. There is a lack of evidence for treatment and prevention strategies that are safe for mothers and infants. Certain dietary deficiencies in a pregnant or postnatal woman's diet may cause postnatal depression. By correcting these deficiencies postnatal depression could be prevented in some women. Specific examples of dietary supplements aimed at preventing postnatal depression include: omega-3 fatty acids, iron, folate, s-adenosyl-L-methionine, cobalamin, pyridoxine, riboflavin, vitamin D and calcium.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 369 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 24%
Unspecified 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Researcher 41 11%
Other 105 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 41%
Unspecified 59 16%
Psychology 52 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Other 45 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,260,455
of 12,667,610 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,827
of 10,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,134
of 177,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,667,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.