Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/gScPi03Qkx a disaster, says Jan Geissler @jangeissler http://t.co/Pj22cLcajE #EFGCP14 #AllTrials
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/H5Kl8pG5rK
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/H5Kl8pG5rK
"@GIMBE: Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/m8JPlaZbUz"
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/H5Kl8pG5rK
@dianthusmed @IanatPHP @professor_dave Damning recent figures though Non-publication of large RCTs http://t.co/mCqkv3pPwN
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis. http://t.co/eJLhos06fc
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/UKCDBiAWMC
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/uKbixRCZH9
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/uKbixRCZH9
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/uKbixRCZH9
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/H5Kl8pG5rK
Failure to publish all trial data is a betrayal of the people who took part (see att). Support #AllTrials. http://t.co/CkNzFgZx0p
#EBM Ensayos clínicos sin publicar: riesgos sin beneficios. via @ScHARRTAG | BMJ http://t.co/vVZd9iUiHf
Another #BMJ paper makes into @altmetric's most highly mentioned articles. Read paper on non-publication of trials: http://t.co/IO1zrq5YKy
Another #BMJ paper makes into @altmetric's most highly mentioned articles. Read paper on non-publication of trials: http://t.co/IO1zrq5YKy
元論文はBMJ。全文無料。すでに412ツイートされている: Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/rhTRc03yCb
An estimated 250,000 people took part in trials completed before Jan 2009 for which no results are publicly available http://t.co/5Ntnwh8x27
Trial participation's potential for harm often not balanced by societal benefit of publication of results http://t.co/5Ntnwh8x27
una verdadera tragedia Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/6FRFFedrF9
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/vLJ0fdlAjR
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/D7SGucFRwH
RT @Joanalti Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/rs69colOBH …. @psunye
MT @gedefo_sefh "Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis" http://t.co/DOnznW4APk #AllTrials
MT @gedefo_sefh "Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis" http://t.co/DOnznW4APk #AllTrials
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/8j7QHlaBk0. ¿que informacion manejamos?
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/8j7QHlaBk0. ¿que informacion manejamos?
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/8j7QHlaBk0. ¿que informacion manejamos?
RESEARCH Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis. http://t.co/KqRhDZgNGT
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/mzFMlKB87b
RCTの実に30%が雑誌に掲載されず。ファンネルプロットを見ていてもいつも感じることですが、世に出てくる研究がどれだけポジティブスタディに偏っているかの良い証拠ですね。 http://t.co/Upednt3aRd http://t.co/UjijDQMm9Y
RCTの実に30%が雑誌に掲載されず。ファンネルプロットを見ていてもいつも感じることですが、世に出てくる研究がどれだけポジティブスタディに偏っているかの良い証拠ですね。... http://t.co/mFKG1HYhRZ
29% of clinical trials never published, worse w industry funding, 78% of unpublished studies don't post their data http://t.co/EpUcXLe0CB
#EBM Ensayos clínicos sin publicar: riesgos sin beneficios. via @ScHARRTAG | BMJ http://t.co/vVZd9iUiHf
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/0OrOX5tiI3
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/0OrOX5tiI3
BMJ: 171 unpublished trials with an estimated enrollment of 299.763 study participants http://t.co/IPL1x4IZCA @AlltrialsItalia @PaulGlasziou
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/H5Kl8pG5rK
BMJ: 171 unpublished trials with an estimated enrollment of 299.763 study participants http://t.co/IPL1x4IZCA @AlltrialsItalia @PaulGlasziou
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
"non-publication is common among large randomized clinical trials" @BMJ_Open #AllTrials http://t.co/LAeCd47Ghe
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Review shows 299 763 trial participants let down because results not published. We should do better. http://t.co/3Hn5q25qtD
Non-publication of large RCTs: http://t.co/omO3tmqBTJ
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/iCYxfDK82W
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | @bmj_company http://t.co/G7FzBijt4M - #publichealth
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | @bmj_company http://t.co/G7FzBijt4M - #publichealth
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/uOiSgNvf88
one of every three registered trials,in http://t.co/6hgMSSenQi remained unpublished http://t.co/FOh3TyBIIj #rct #alltrials
29% of clinical trials never published, worse w industry funding, 78% of unpublished studies don't post their data http://t.co/EpUcXLe0CB
RT @directorhsc: @bmj_latest - Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/Ez83W164rV!
29% of clinical trials never published, worse w industry funding, 78% of unpublished studies don't post their data http://t.co/EpUcXLe0CB
BMJ - Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/IL2JjYC5zB!
32% of large industry-funded clinical trials unpublished 3 yrs later (vs 18% of non-industry trials) http://t.co/QwJJZallDX RT...
32% of large industry-funded clinical trials unpublished 3 yrs later (vs 18% of non-industry trials) http://t.co/QwJJZallDX RT...
32% of large industry-funded clinical trials unpublished 3 yrs later (vs 18% of non-industry trials) http://t.co/QwJJZallDX RT...
32% of large industry-funded clinical trials unpublished 3 yrs later (vs 18% of non-industry trials) http://t.co/QwJJZallDX RT...
32% of large industry-funded clinical trials unpublished 3 yrs later (vs 18% of non-industry trials) http://t.co/QwJJZallDX RT...
29% of clinical trials never published, worse w industry funding, 78% of unpublished studies don't post their data http://t.co/EpUcXLe0CB
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/J31zfUGdhT
Non-publication of results of large clinical trials common, availability of results on http://t.co/60YexiXKZb limited http://t.co/m8yG2XJB0L
Non-publication of results of large clinical trials common, availability of results on http://t.co/60YexiXKZb limited http://t.co/m8yG2XJB0L
The British Medical Journal did an assessment on reported studies: http://t.co/WWlk9YckjN Not a pretty picture #bcsm
WOW RT @crgonzalez 585 registered studies examined by BMJ on http://t.co/TSbKZELnHq, 29% no published results http://t.co/ZSSVW6cFER #bcsm
RT @crgonzalez Of 585 reg. studies examined by the BMJ on http://t.co/SSGl3Joiob, 29% no published results http://t.co/WaGPvfFZBC #bcsm
WOW RT @crgonzalez 585 registered studies examined by BMJ on http://t.co/TSbKZELnHq, 29% no published results http://t.co/ZSSVW6cFER #bcsm
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
未公開の臨床試験の結果についての調査(論文)Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis http://t.co/TVEgao9j51
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of registered clinical trials don't have results published. Non-publication more common in industry funded trials http://t.co/cHmNntwWrx
29% of clinical trials never published, worse w industry funding, 78% of unpublished studies don't post their data http://t.co/EpUcXLe0CB
Embarrassing. 300,000 individuals exposed to treatments and no reporting of results. http://t.co/c8F14rA7Ct
“@hhask: Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/yI5Mj3eUU8” #ptsafety
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/jOV6B1WlIh
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/QQ17zluEHp
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis | BMJ http://t.co/vWGLhgoMRU
Cerca de un 30% de ensayos clínicos no llega a publicar resultados: éticamente reprobable para los participantes! http://t.co/Qh4RvcxnRV
Paper in @bmj_latest on unpublished trial data and #bioethics: http://t.co/2cnNKWGFEP
Cerca de un 30% de ensayos clínicos no llega a publicar resultados: éticamente reprobable para los participantes! http://t.co/Qh4RvcxnRV
Cerca de un 30% de ensayos clínicos no llega a publicar resultados: éticamente reprobable para los participantes! http://t.co/Qh4RvcxnRV
Vart tar forskningsresultaten vägen? undrar några amerikanska forskare i BMJ. http://t.co/dlNiQ8kmeA
Ptes expuestos a riesgos en 29% ECCA sin publicar. Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials.BMJ http://t.co/tZQOZELVIj …