↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic variability in ARCA2 and identification of a core ataxic phenotype with slow progression

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic variability in ARCA2 and identification of a core ataxic phenotype with slow progression
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyril Mignot, Emmanuelle Apartis, Alexandra Durr, Charles Marques Lourenço, Perrine Charles, David Devos, Caroline Moreau, Pascale de Lonlay, Nathalie Drouot, Lydie Burglen, Nadine Kempf, Elsa Nourisson, Sandra Chantot-Bastaraud, Anne-Sophie Lebre, Marlène Rio, Yves Chaix, Eric Bieth, Emmanuel Roze, Isabelle Bonnet, Sandrine Canaple, Coralie Rastel, Alexis Brice, Agnès Rötig, Isabelle Desguerre, Christine Tranchant, Michel Koenig, Mathieu Anheim

Abstract

Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia 2 (ARCA2) is a recently identified recessive ataxia due to ubiquinone deficiency and biallelic mutations in the ADCK3 gene. The phenotype of the twenty-one patients reported worldwide varies greatly. Thus, it is difficult to decide which ataxic patients are good candidates for ADCK3 screening without evidence of ubiquinone deficiency. We report here the clinical and molecular data of 10 newly diagnosed patients from seven families and update the disease history of four additional patients reported in previous articles to delineate the clinical spectrum of ARCA2 phenotype and to provide a guide to the molecular diagnosis. First signs occurred before adulthood in all 14 patients. Cerebellar atrophy appeared in all instances. The progressivity and severity of ataxia varied greatly, but no patients had the typical inexorable ataxic course that characterizes other childhood-onset recessive ataxias. The ataxia was frequently associated with other neurological signs. Importantly, stroke-like episodes contributed to significant deterioration of the neurological status in two patients. Ubidecarenone therapy markedly improved the movement disorders, including ataxia, in two other patients. The 7 novel ADCK3 mutations found in the 10 new patients were two missense and five truncating mutations. There was no apparent correlation between the genotype and the phenotype. Our series reveals that the clinical spectrum of ARCA2 encompasses a range of ataxic phenotypes. On one end, it may manifest as a pure ataxia with very slow progressivity and, on the other end, as a severe infantile encephalopathy with cerebellar atrophy. The phenotype of most patients, however, lies in between. It is characterized by a very slowly progressive or apparently stable ataxia associated with other signs of central nervous system involvement. We suggest undergoing the molecular analysis of ADCK3 in patients with this phenotype and in those with cerebellar atrophy and a stroke-like episode. The diagnosis of patients with a severe ARCA2 phenotype may also be performed on the basis of biological data, i.e. low ubiquinone level or functional evidence of ubiquinone deficiency. This diagnosis is crucial since the neurological status of some patients may be improved by ubiquinone therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,563,788
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,429
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,530
of 220,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.