↓ Skip to main content

The Hospital Microbiome Project: Meeting Report for the 1st Hospital Microbiome Project Workshop on sampling design and building science measurements, Chicago, USA, June 7th–8th 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Hospital Microbiome Project: Meeting Report for the 1st Hospital Microbiome Project Workshop on sampling design and building science measurements, Chicago, USA, June 7th–8th 2012
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, April 2013
DOI 10.4056/sigs.3717348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Smith, John Alverdy, Gary An, Maureen Coleman, Sylvia Garcia-Houchins, Jessica Green, Kevin Keegan, Scott T. Kelley, Benjamin C. Kirkup, Larry Kociolek, Hal Levin, Emily Landon, Paula Olsiewski, Rob Knight, Jeffrey Siegel, Stephen Weber, Jack Gilbert

Abstract

This report details the outcome of the 1st Hospital Microbiome Project workshop held on June 7th-8th, 2012 at the University of Chicago, USA. The workshop was arranged to determine the most appropriate sampling strategy and approach to building science measurement to characterize the development of a microbial community within a new hospital pavilion being built at the University of Chicago Medical Center. The workshop made several recommendations and led to the development of a full proposal to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation as well as to the creation of the Hospital Microbiome Consortium.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#289
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,481
of 209,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.