↓ Skip to main content

Quality measures for the care of patients with lateral epicondylalgia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality measures for the care of patients with lateral epicondylalgia
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Minaya-Muñoz, Francesc Medina-Mirapeix, Fermin Valera-Garrido

Abstract

Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) defines a condition of varying degrees of pain near the lateral epicondyle. Studies on the management of LE indicated unexplained variations in the use of pharmacologic, non-pharmacological and surgical treatments. The main aim of this paper was to develop and evaluate clinical quality measures (QMs) or quality indicators, which may be used to assess the quality of the processes of examination, education and treatment of patients with LE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 20%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 18%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,161,766
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,818
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,583
of 212,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#31
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.