You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011793.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bilal H Kirmani, Sion G Jones, S C Malaisrie, Darryl A Chung, Richard Jnn Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 301 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 91 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 15% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 103 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,008
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,726
of 327,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#195
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.