You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/fee.1481 |
| Authors |
Evan H Campbell Grant, Erin Muths, Rachel A Katz, Stefano Canessa, Michael J Adams, Jennifer R Ballard, Lee Berger, Cheryl J Briggs, Jeremy TH Coleman, Matthew J Gray, M Camille Harris, Reid N Harris, Blake Hossack, Kathryn P Huyvaert, Jonathan Kolby, Karen R Lips, Robert E Lovich, Hamish I McCallum, Joseph R Mendelson, Priya Nanjappa, Deanna H Olson, Jenny G Powers, Katherine LD Richgels, Robin E Russell, Benedikt R Schmidt, Annemarieke Spitzen‐van der Sluijs, Mary Kay Watry, Douglas C Woodhams, C LeAnn White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,682,032
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#746
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,280
of 327,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.