↓ Skip to main content

Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/fee.1481
Authors

Evan H Campbell Grant, Erin Muths, Rachel A Katz, Stefano Canessa, Michael J Adams, Jennifer R Ballard, Lee Berger, Cheryl J Briggs, Jeremy TH Coleman, Matthew J Gray, M Camille Harris, Reid N Harris, Blake Hossack, Kathryn P Huyvaert, Jonathan Kolby, Karen R Lips, Robert E Lovich, Hamish I McCallum, Joseph R Mendelson, Priya Nanjappa, Deanna H Olson, Jenny G Powers, Katherine LD Richgels, Robin E Russell, Benedikt R Schmidt, Annemarieke Spitzen-van der Sluijs, Mary Kay Watry, Douglas C Woodhams, C LeAnn White

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 47%
Environmental Science 21 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 18 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,749,157
of 18,846,097 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#608
of 1,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,313
of 276,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,846,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.