↓ Skip to main content

Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/fee.1481
Authors

Evan H Campbell Grant, Erin Muths, Rachel A Katz, Stefano Canessa, Michael J Adams, Jennifer R Ballard, Lee Berger, Cheryl J Briggs, Jeremy TH Coleman, Matthew J Gray, M Camille Harris, Reid N Harris, Blake Hossack, Kathryn P Huyvaert, Jonathan Kolby, Karen R Lips, Robert E Lovich, Hamish I McCallum, Joseph R Mendelson, Priya Nanjappa, Deanna H Olson, Jenny G Powers, Katherine LD Richgels, Robin E Russell, Benedikt R Schmidt, Annemarieke Spitzen‐van der Sluijs, Mary Kay Watry, Douglas C Woodhams, C LeAnn White

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 40%
Environmental Science 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,909,791
of 26,587,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#785
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,362
of 329,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.