↓ Skip to main content

Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001561.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shah Ebrahim, Fiona Taylor, Kirsten Ward, Andrew Beswick, Margaret Burke, George Davey Smith

Abstract

Multiple risk factor interventions using counselling and educational methods assumed to be efficacious and cost-effective in reducing coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality and morbidity and that they should be expanded. Trials examining risk factor changes have cast doubt on the effectiveness of these interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 466 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 1%
Other 5 1%
Student > Master 5 1%
Researcher 4 <1%
Lecturer 3 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 438 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 <1%
Psychology 3 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 438 94%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#505,816
of 14,793,395 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,414
of 11,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,375
of 83,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,793,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.