↓ Skip to main content

Does relative remoteness affect chronic disease outcomes? Geographic variation in chronic disease mortality in Australia, 2002-2006

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does relative remoteness affect chronic disease outcomes? Geographic variation in chronic disease mortality in Australia, 2002-2006
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1111/1753-6405.12126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramakrishna Chondur, Shu Qin Li, Steven Guthridge, Paul Lawton

Abstract

To examine the variation of chronic disease mortality by remoteness areas of Australia, including states and territories.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 35%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Librarian 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,075,719
of 12,479,977 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#373
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,202
of 177,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,479,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.