↓ Skip to main content

Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-0559.1
Authors

Sabrina Servanty, Sarah J. Converse, Larissa L. Bailey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 53%
Environmental Science 18 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,695,316
of 15,330,702 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#495
of 2,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,798
of 187,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,330,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.