↓ Skip to main content

Making two parallel land-use sector debates meet: Carbon leakage and indirect land-use change

Overview of attention for article published in Land Use Policy, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making two parallel land-use sector debates meet: Carbon leakage and indirect land-use change
Published in
Land Use Policy, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.012
Authors

Madelene Ostwald, Sabine Henders

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 9 11%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 40 49%
Unspecified 13 16%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 13 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,513,851
of 12,062,799 outputs
Outputs from Land Use Policy
#217
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,200
of 159,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Use Policy
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,062,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.