You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating clinical periodontal measures as surrogates for bacterial exposure: The Oral Infections and Vascular Disease Epidemiology Study (INVEST)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan T Demmer, Panos N Papapanou, David R Jacobs, Moïse Desvarieux |
Abstract |
Epidemiologic studies of periodontal infection as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease often use clinical periodontal measures as a surrogate for the underlying bacterial exposure of interest. There are currently no methodological studies evaluating which clinical periodontal measures best reflect the levels of subgingival bacterial colonization in population-based settings. We investigated the characteristics of clinical periodontal definitions that were most representative of exposure to bacterial species that are believed to be either markers, or themselves etiologic, of periodontal disease. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 27% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,771,775
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#610
of 2,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,032
of 164,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.