↓ Skip to main content

Detection of quantitative trait loci in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle using genome-wide association studies

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of quantitative trait loci in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle using genome-wide association studies
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-45-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunduimijid Bolormaa, Jennie E Pryce, Kathryn E Kemper, Ben J Hayes, Yuandan Zhang, Bruce Tier, William Barendse, Antonio Reverter, Mike E Goddard

Abstract

The apparent effect of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on phenotype depends on the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the SNP and a quantitative trait locus (QTL). However, the phase of LD between a SNP and a QTL may differ between Bos indicus and Bos taurus because they diverged at least one hundred thousand years ago. Here, we test the hypothesis that the apparent effect of a SNP on a quantitative trait depends on whether the SNP allele is inherited from a Bos taurus or Bos indicus ancestor.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Mexico 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 67%
Unspecified 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,807,594
of 12,443,702 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#259
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,912
of 178,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,443,702 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.