↓ Skip to main content

HOBE+, a case study: a virtual community of practice to support innovation in primary care in Basque Public Health Service

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HOBE+, a case study: a virtual community of practice to support innovation in primary care in Basque Public Health Service
Published in
BMC Primary Care, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Galder Abos Mendizabal, Roberto Nuño Solinís, Irune Zaballa González

Abstract

A virtual professional community of practice (VCoP), HOBE+, has been set up to foster and facilitate innovation in primary care. It is aimed at all primary care professionals of the Basque Public Health Service (Osakidetza) in the provinces of Biscay and Araba. HOBE + is a VCoP that incorporates innovation management from the generation of ideas to their implementation in primary care practice.Objectives: To assess the process of developing and implementing a VCoP open to all primary care professionals in Osakidetza, including the take-up, participation and use of this VCoP in the first 15 months after its launch in October 2011. In addition, the usefulness of the VCoP was assessed through a survey gathering the opinions of the professionals involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Social Sciences 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 8%
Engineering 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,983,785
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,504
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,318
of 228,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.