↓ Skip to main content

Radioisotopes for metastatic bone pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radioisotopes for metastatic bone pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003347.pub2
Pubmed ID
Abstract

This is an update of the review published in Issue 4, 2003. Bone metastasis cause severe pain as well as pathological fractures, hypercalcaemia and spinal cord compression. Treatment strategies currently available to relieve pain from bone metastases include analgesia, radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, radioisotopes and bisphosphonates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 10%
United Kingdom 1 10%
Hong Kong 1 10%
Canada 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 160%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 100%
Unspecified 9 90%
Other 9 90%
Student > Bachelor 8 80%
Other 30 300%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 580%
Unspecified 10 100%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Chemistry 2 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Other 5 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2011.
All research outputs
#3,094,777
of 4,506,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,341
of 7,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,005
of 54,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.