↓ Skip to main content

Computer simulation of cervical tissue response to a hydraulic dilator device

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computer simulation of cervical tissue response to a hydraulic dilator device
Published in
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4682-10-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nenad Filipovic, Dalibor Nikolic, Igor Saveljic, Irena Tanaskovic, Nebojsa Zdravkovic, Aleksandar Zivanovic, Petar Arsenijevic, Branislav Jeremic, Slobodan Arsenijevic

Abstract

Classical mechanical dilators for cervical dilation are associated with various complications, such as uterine perforation, cervical laceration, infections and intraperitoneal hemorrhage. A new medical device called continuous controllable balloon dilator (CCBD) was constructed to make a significant reduction in all of the side effects of traditional mechanical dilation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Other 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 5 38%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,209,145
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#246
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,821
of 215,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.