↓ Skip to main content

The influence of low-level laser irradiation on spinal cord injuries following ischemia- reperfusion in rats1

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of low-level laser irradiation on spinal cord injuries following ischemia- reperfusion in rats1
Published in
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0102-865020150090000005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir Sotoudeh, Amirali Jahanshahi, Saeed Zareiy, Mohammad Darvishi, Nasim Roodbari, Ali Bazzazan

Abstract

To investigate if low level laser therapy (LLLT) can decrease spinal cord injuries after temporary induced spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion in rats because of its anti-inflammatory effects. Forty eight rats were randomized into two study groups of 24 rats each. In group I, ischemic-reperfusion (I-R) injury was induced without any treatment. Group II, was irradiated four times about 20 minutes for the following three days. The lesion site directly was irradiated transcutaneously to the spinal direction with 810 nm diode laser with output power of 150 mW. Functional recovery, immunohistochemical and histopathological changes were assessed. The average functional recovery scores of group II were significantly higher than that the score of group I (2.86 ± 0.68, vs 1.38 ± 0.09; p<0.05). Histopathologic evaluations in group II were showed a mild changes in compare with group I, that suggested this group survived from I-R consequences. Moreover, as seen from TUNEL results, LLLT also protected neurons from I-R-induced apoptosis in rats. Low level laser therapy was be able to minimize the damage to the rat spinal cord of reperfusion-induced injury.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%