↓ Skip to main content

How do selected crop rotations affect soil organic carbon in boreo-temperate systems? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do selected crop rotations affect soil organic carbon in boreo-temperate systems? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0086-y
Authors

Magnus Land, Neal Robert Haddaway, Katarina Hedlund, Helene Bracht Jørgensen, Thomas Kätterer, Per-Erik Isberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 42%
Unspecified 7 27%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,309,792
of 13,181,286 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#123
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,889
of 264,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,181,286 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them