3,435 followers
Why are we convinced by ad hominems? Because we are so rational—a Bayesian analysis. https://t.co/6e4Lf2rZrA
Why are we convinced by ad hominems? Because we are so rational—a Bayesian analysis. https://t.co/6e4Lf2rZrA
@ortoiseortoise @lessdismalsci @RTodKelly @epicciuto @samwilkinson I'm generally a fan of Oaksford (and Chater, his frequent co-author). https://t.co/F1HsA7FXw9