You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Risk factors for fatal and nonfatal repetition of suicide attempts: a literature review
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, November 2013
Cesare Cornaggia, Beghi, Rosenbaum, Cerri
This review aimed to identify the evidence for predictors of repetition of suicide attempts, and more specifically for subsequent completed suicide.
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||38||17%|
|Student > Master||27||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||27||12%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||56||25%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||6||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.