You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining Metabolically Healthy Obesity: Role of Dietary and Lifestyle Factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0076188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine M. Phillips, Christina Dillon, Janas M. Harrington, Vera J. C. McCarthy, Patricia M. Kearney, Anthony P. Fitzgerald, Ivan J. Perry |
| Abstract |
There is a current lack of consensus on defining metabolically healthy obesity (MHO). Limited data on dietary and lifestyle factors and MHO exist. The aim of this study is to compare the prevalence, dietary factors and lifestyle behaviours of metabolically healthy and unhealthy obese and non-obese subjects according to different metabolic health criteria. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 24% |
| Unknown | 52 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,059,400
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,741
of 210,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,981
of 217,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#681
of 5,119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.