↓ Skip to main content

Simulation research to enhance patient safety and outcomes: recommendations of the Simnovate Patient Safety Domain Group

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulation research to enhance patient safety and outcomes: recommendations of the Simnovate Patient Safety Domain Group
Published in
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, March 2017
DOI 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000173
Authors

Philip H Pucher, Robyn Tamblyn, Daniel Boorman, Mary Dixon-Woods, Liam Donaldson, Tim Draycott, Alan Forster, Vinay Nadkarni, Chris Power, Nick Sevdalis, Rajesh Aggarwal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Unspecified 5 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Psychology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,980,921
of 11,340,439 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
#73
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,510
of 264,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,340,439 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.