↓ Skip to main content

Using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) to diagnose steroid‐responsive disease and guide asthma management in routine care

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) to diagnose steroid‐responsive disease and guide asthma management in routine care
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-3-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Price, Dermot Ryan, Annie Burden, Julie Von Ziegenweidt, Shuna Gould, Daryl Freeman, Kevin Gruffydd-Jones, Anne Copland, Clifford Godley, Alison Chisholm, Mike Thomas

Abstract

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a surrogate marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation and good predictor of corticosteroid response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Other 9 12%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,794,256
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#165
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,729
of 228,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.