↓ Skip to main content

The implementation of an external quality assurance method for point- of- care tests for HIV and syphilis in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The implementation of an external quality assurance method for point- of- care tests for HIV and syphilis in Tanzania
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pieter W Smit, David Mabey, Thomas van der Vlis, Hans Korporaal, Julius Mngara, John Changalucha, Jim Todd, Rosanna W Peeling

Abstract

External quality assurance (EQA) programmes, which are routinely used in laboratories, have not been widely implemented for point-of- care tests (POCTs). A study was performed in ten health centres in Tanzania, to implement the use of dried blood spots (DBS) as an EQA method for HIV and syphilis (POCTs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Other 9 17%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,780,136
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,160
of 8,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,544
of 218,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#29
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.