You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast radiotherapy for breast cancer: 5-year results for local control and overall survival from the TARGIT-A randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61950-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jayant S Vaidya, Frederik Wenz, Max Bulsara, Jeffrey S Tobias, David J Joseph, Mohammed Keshtgar, Henrik L Flyger, Samuele Massarut, Michael Alvarado, Christobel Saunders, Wolfgang Eiermann, Marinos Metaxas, Elena Sperk, Marc Sütterlin, Douglas Brown, Laura Esserman, Mario Roncadin, Alastair Thompson, John A Dewar, Helle M R Holtveg, Steffi Pigorsch, Mary Falzon, Eleanor Harris, April Matthews, Chris Brew-Graves, Ingrid Potyka, Tammy Corica, Norman R Williams, Michael Baum, on behalf of the TARGIT trialists' group |
| Abstract |
The TARGIT-A trial compared risk-adapted radiotherapy using single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) versus fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for breast cancer. We report 5-year results for local recurrence and the first analysis of overall survival. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 31% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 66% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 470 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 66 | 14% |
| Researcher | 62 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 128 | 26% |
| Unknown | 92 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 262 | 54% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 8% |
| Unknown | 120 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 259. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#143,728
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,858
of 42,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,008
of 226,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#21
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.