↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a self-management program for dual sensory impaired seniors in aged care settings: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a self-management program for dual sensory impaired seniors in aged care settings: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieve M Roets-Merken, Maud JL Graff, Sytse U Zuidema, Pieter GJM Hermsen, Steven Teerenstra, Gertrudis IJM Kempen, Myrra JFJ Vernooij-Dassen

Abstract

Five to 25 percent of residents in aged care settings have a combined hearing and visual sensory impairment. Usual care is generally restricted to single sensory impairment, neglecting the consequences of dual sensory impairment on social participation and autonomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-management program for seniors who acquired dual sensory impairment at old age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 18%
Psychology 13 8%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 46 29%