↓ Skip to main content

A realist synthesis of the effect of social accountability interventions on health service providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A realist synthesis of the effect of social accountability interventions on health service providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-98
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsbet Lodenstein, Marjolein Dieleman, Barend Gerretsen, Jacqueline EW Broerse

Abstract

Accountability has center stage in the current post-Millennium Development Goals (MDG) debate. One of the effective strategies for building equitable health systems and providing quality health services is the strengthening of citizen-driven or social accountability processes. The monitoring of actions and decisions of policymakers and providers by citizens is regarded as a right in itself but also as an alternative to weak administrative accountability mechanisms, in particular in settings with poor governance. The effects of social accountability interventions are often based on assumptions and are difficult to evaluate because of their complex nature and context sensitivity. This study aims to review and assess the available evidence for the effect of social accountability interventions on policymakers' and providers' responsiveness in countries with medium to low levels of governance capacity and quality. For policymakers and practitioners engaged in health system strengthening, social accountability initiatives and rights-based approaches to health, the findings of this review may help when reflecting on the assumptions and theories of change behind their policies and interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 4%
Netherlands 2 1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Student > Master 32 18%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 10 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 50 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,029,086
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#838
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,613
of 215,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.